Monday, October 31, 2011
So, this is fun
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Cool Thing to try?
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
For those Freudian people.
A Dangerous Method is due to release next month. Its about Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud... not sure if its actually based on fact, but it does look interesting enough. Good actors and actresses. Might be something to look into for those of you who are concentrating on psychological concepts.
For Kelsey.
Meek's Cutoff is the movie I was telling you about a couple of weeks ago. I think you'll really enjoy it. Its SLOW but stay with it! The whole film is comprised of beautiful, sweeping landscapes of the West. Let me know what you think about the ending, it frustrated the hell out of me but its super thought provoking.
For Hali
Monday, October 24, 2011
For Augusta - Allen Ginsberg's Photographs
This exhibition was at the National Gallery last fall. It included an extensive collection of Allen Ginsberg's photographs, after archivists discovered his extensive negative and 5x7 print collection. Ginsberg bought a cheap Kodak Retina in a pawn shop and began documenting his fellow beat authors during their prominent rise to fame. He then started shooting again in the eighties, which reveal some amazing portraits of William S. Burroughs, his life-long partner. One amazing thing about the exhibition was that Ginsberg's handwriting was at the bottom of every photograph, lengthily describing each situation in full detail. This could possibly be an approach to try if you felt inspired to do so.
Sunday, October 23, 2011
For Victoria
I know your project is about yourself and people close to you, but I thought you might consider referencing some imagery from documentary photographers, specifically those that show people after natural disaster that are disconnected from loved ones, or children in war torn areas that are literally abandoned by parents. I don't suggest recreating them, just see what makes these images emotional, and translate that into your own work.
For Kate C
Art + Botany: X-ray Photography
For Adriana (Late!)
You should check out Danny Santos II. He is a street photographer from Singapore, and I think his series The Street Is Everyones Catwalk could be applied to some of the stuff you're trying to do.
For Alexis (Late!)
You should look up De Biasi Mario. He unfortunately does not have a central website, but you can Google image search his photographs fairly easily. He's an Italian photographer that began working during WWII. There's something very relatable to your work about identity that also relates to perception, which could be inspiring to you.
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
For Ravi
I interned with this guy about 2 years ago. He does commercial work to pay the bills, but on his free time he often photographs strangers that he meets on the street. He usually sets up a mini studio outside and then has his wife (and other assistants) ask people to come get their portrait taken. He is able to relate to each person through friendly chit-chat, which relaxes the person. This so called "chummy" atmosphere allows him to capture wonderful moments of pure personality. I know your dappling with making your subjects uncomfortable, but I thought I would show you an example of the other side of that.
For Diego
Like I told Kate C. below, movies are wonderful resources because they are so chalk full of well-executed imagery and themes. I think Son of Rambow relates to the whole "childhood" aspect of your concept. Of course it does deal with actual kids, but the shenanigans they get into reminded me of the games Kate and Mel were describing during your crit. I really recommend watching any sort of boyhood (coming of age) movie, from the classics like THE GOONIES to modern ones like Son of Rambow or even Hesher (although that is much darker).
For Kate C.
I often find that movies are great sources of inspiration! About 1 minute and 15 seconds into this clip from A Beautiful Mind we see a chaotic collection of papers/pictures pinned up to walls that to us (and to the wife) seem to be ramblings of a mad man, but in the mind of of the man (John Nash) it all makes perfect sense. Is this the sort of imagery your hoping to capture for your photographic project?
For Mark
Ravi
A series of self portraits by strangers on the beach by Benoit Paille. A good example of giving more control to the strangers you photograph, even if it's just the shutter button.
For Jamie
For Adriana
Francesca Woodman, On Being an Angel #1, 1977
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
For Augusta
Check out Wesley Cummings
For Adriana and Hali
Family Picture Perfect from The Balletcats on Vimeo.
Clarence John Laughlin
I just recently learned about this photographer. His work sort of reminds me of yours, I thought you should check him out!
For Kate
Kate,
For Kate
Not sure how much this applies to what you're doing in exploring your parents through your adult eyes, but i did mention it in class. Aline Smithson's portrait series of her mother...if you were looking for any way to give it a whimsical spin heh heh. has a nice artist statement with the series too
http://www.alinesmithson.com/site.html
For Thibby
For Hali
For Kate
@ Sam
For Adrianna
I was looking through Olivia Wright's series Figure of Speech (under portrait) and was thinking of the mask's you have been using. Instead of using a full mask she's changing different parts of their faces. I know it's not exactly what you're looking for but it might be something to try.
=)
For Hali
There is this photographer named Ryan Pflunger that I found a long time ago. He mostly photographs other gay men, some lovers some friends. However, he has one series that he did on his father, it's titled Not Without My Father. This is the series I want you to look at. Specifically the last image which is a dyptic of he and his father and old family photo's of the two of them. I don't nessecarily feel that this series is extremely strong but it is a portrait of a relationship which is beneficial to your concept.
<3<3
Monday, October 17, 2011
Paul Graham - Definitely Read
Photography is Easy, Photography is Difficult
It’s so easy it's ridiculous. It’s so easy that I can’t even begin – I just don’t know where to start. After all, it’s just looking at things. We all do that. It’s simply a way of recording what you see – point the camera at it, and press a button. How hard is that? And what's more, in this digital age, its free - doesn't even cost you the price of film. It’s so simple and basic, it's laughable.
It’s so difficult because it’s everywhere, every place, all the time, even right now. It's the view of this pen in my hand as I write this, it's an image of you reading now. Drift your consciousness up and out of this text and see: it's right there, across the room - there... and there. Then it’s gone. You didn’t photograph it, because you didn’t think it was worth it. And now it’s too late, that moment has evaporated. But another one has arrived, instantly. Now. Because life is flowing through and around us, rushing onwards and outwards, in every direction.
But if it's everywhere and all the time, and so easy to make, then what’s of value? which pictures matter? Is it the hard won photograph, knowing, controlled, previsualised? Yes. Or are those contrived, dry and belabored? Sometimes. Is it the offhand snapshot made on a whim. For sure. Or is that just a lucky observation, some random moment caught by chance? Maybe. Is it an intuitive expression of liquid intelligence? Exactly. Or the distillation of years of looking seeing thinking photography. Definitely.
"Life’s single lesson: that there is more accident to it than a man can admit to in a lifetime, and stay sane"
- Thomas Pynchon, V
Ok, so how do I make sense of that never ending flow, the fog that covers life here and now. How do I see through that, how do I cross that boundary? Do I walk down the street and make pictures of strangers, do I make a drama-tableaux with my friends, do I only photograph my beloved, my family, myself? Or maybe I should just photograph the land, the rocks and trees – they don't move or complain or push back. The old houses? The new houses? Do I go to a war zone on the other side of the world, or just to the corner store, or not leave my room at all?
Yes and yes and yes. That's the choice you are spoiled for, just don't let it stop you. Be aware of it, but don't get stuck – relax, it’s everything and everywhere. You will find it, and it will find you, just start, somehow, anyhow, but: start.
Okay, but shouldn’t I have a clear coherent theme, surely I have to know what I’m doing first? That would be nice, but I doubt Robert Frank knew what it all meant when he started, or for that matter Cindy Sherman or Robert Mapplethorpe or Atget or... so you shouldn’t expect it. The more preplanned it is the less room for surprise, for the world to talk back, for the idea to find itself, allowing ambivalence and ambiguity to seep in, and sometimes those are more important than certainty and clarity. The work often says more than the artist intended.
But my photography doesn't always fit into neat, coherent series, so maybe I need to roll freeform around this world, unfettered, able to photograph whatever and whenever: the sky, my feet, the coffee in my cup, the flowers I just noticed, my friends and lovers, and, because it's all my life, surely it will make sense? Perhaps. Sometimes that works, sometimes it’s indulgent, but really it’s your choice, because you are also free to not make 'sense'.
"so finally even this story is absurd, which is an important part of the point, if any, since that it should have none whatsoever seems part of the point too"
- Malcolm Lowry, Ghostkeeper.
Ok, so I need time to think about this. To allow myself that freedom for a short time. A couple of years. Maybe I won't find my answer, but I will be around others who understand this question, who have reached a similar point. Maybe I’ll start on the wrong road, or for the wrong reasons – because I liked cameras, because I thought photography was an easy option, but if I’m forced to try, then perhaps I’ll stumble on some little thing, that makes a piece of sense to me, or simply just feels right. If I concentrate on that, then maybe it grows, and in its modest ineffable way, begins to matter. Like photographing Arab-Americans in the USA as human beings with lives and hopes, families and feelings, straight, gay, young, old, with all the humanity that Hollywood never grants them. Or the black community of New Haven, doing inexplicable joyous, ridiculous theatrical-charades that explode my preconceptions into a thousand pieces. Or funny-disturbing-sad echoes of a snapshot of my old boyfriend. Or the anonymous suburban landscape of upstate in a way that defies the spectacular images we're addicted to. Or... how we women use our bodies to display who we believe we should be, Or...
"A Novel? No, I don't have the endurance any more. To write a novel, you have to be like Atlas, holding up the whole world on your shoulders, and supporting it there for months and years, while its affairs work themselves out..."
- J. M. Coetzee, Diary of a Bad Year.
And hopefully I will carry on, and develop it, because it is worthwhile. Carry on because it matters when other things don't seem to matter so much: the money job, the editorial assignment, the fashion shoot. Then one day it will be complete enough to believe it is finished. Made. Existing. Done. And in its own way: a contribution, and all that effort and frustration and time and money will fall away. It was worth it, because it is something real, that didn't exist before you made it exist: a sentient work of art and power and sensitivity, that speaks of this world and your fellow human beings place within it. Isn't that beautiful?
Yale MFA Photography Graduation, February 2009.
Saturday, October 15, 2011
For Adriana
Adriana, this is the movie I was talking to you about this past week (Submarine is it's name). Cheers.
Thursday, October 13, 2011
A link for Diego.
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Monday, October 10, 2011
Sunday, October 9, 2011
New Images
Ravi's assignment for Kate & Success of Failure
Success of Failure
Success dwells in the shadows of failure's boundless potential! Or rather, the theoretical idea of failure.. I appreciate the author's acknowledgment of failure as a starting point into another body of work, or refinement of your intentions. Our ever-changing idea of "rightness" (in the art world, at least) gives me the feeling that it's impossible to achieve a personal understanding of success from your work. That is, unless you've reached an ending point or a final destination; that last image you'll ever create or the final time you'll ever critically think of work. For this reason, failure is a necessary motivator! An instigator, even. As for the idea of failure through unfinished work and mental obstacles- how do we interpret this as failure? Have we learned from our beginnings, or do we move towards something blindly without recognition of the steps taken to achieve even the most basic conceptual thought of our work.
Sam at Mel
restatement:I think it would be really good for you to examine this idea of passage of time, as well as the presence and absence of people. Go to a bus stop, bus stations, train station etc. and photograph the phases and transitions of the people there. The people that remain there after a period of time and the people the quickly leave. You might try and set up a tripod and take a series of images that almost turns into stop motion where you can go back and view the progression of peoples movement.
Success of Failure
Success of Failure
Joel Fisher: The Success of Failure
Success of Failure
Response to Failure Essay.
Success of Failure
"Often things fail only in amount- too this or too that. Too agressive, too argumentative, too arrogant, too arty, too big, too coercive, too confused, too cultured, too dangerous, too limited, too self-conscious, too sentimental, too sloppy, too shy, too subtle, too thin, too little. Too much. The excessive is our preferred value judgement."
This idea of excessiveness in work is what stood out the most for me throughout the entire article. It was the only idea that I truly felt I could agree with and understood why exactly I was agreeing with it. The idea of having everything be bigger and better is engrained into our society, bigger cars, cooler toys, newer computers. Everything must be better than the last. This follows us into our creative process. Causing us to feel the need to top ourselves. The idea of our next work not being even better than our last is considered a failure because our culture forces us to think in this way. This is why, at least for me, the idea of failure isn't "fake" or abstract. Failure is in fact very real. The goal, as we're told, is to do what no one has done. This in itself is a need to progress as much as possible. And, as society tells us, succeeding is achieved by progressing. Everyone fails, it's understood and we know this. Failures do not encourage success, our failures are magnified and will always have a negative light.